实验 74:A68 Adaptive Lambda Router

case-adaptive λ router 在 3-case replay 中同时改善 Chamfer 和 F@5

实验定位 小样本正结果 / 需验证泛化

A68 不是新导出 mesh,而是复用 A67 已经 materialized 的 policy pool,测试一个 no-GT adaptive λ router:根据 carrier 的 conflict ratio、unobserved ratio 和 saturated flag,在 A66 global damping、A67 visible-preserving、A67 coverage-friendly 之间选择。

结果在 3 个 active case 上很干净:A68 选择 gso000→A66 global、gso002→visible-preserving、gso008→coverage-friendly,mean ΔChamfer=-0.0005158、mean ΔF@5=0.002714,同时优于 A66 固定策略的 ΔChamfer=-0.0003909、ΔF@5=0.001858。

限制:这是 3-case 小样本规则,没有 leave-one-out,也没有新 mesh 生成。它的价值是证明“case-adaptive λ pattern”值得做,不足以宣称最终方法泛化。

实验设计(Image-2 风格)

实验设计图:A68 adaptive lambda router
实验设计图:A68 adaptive lambda router
模块设计图:case-adaptive policy selection
模块设计图:case-adaptive policy selection

模块设计(Image-2 风格)

No-GT Routing Rule

  • saturated conflict 且 unobserved 极低:选 coverage-friendly micro damping。
  • moderate conflict 且 unobserved 较低:选 visible-preserving damping。
  • 低冲突或有足够 unobserved/completion room:保留 A66 global damping。

Why It Matters

A67 证明固定 λ 表不够。A68 进一步说明,TRELLIS.2+VGGT 融合的核心不只是“局部残差”,而是根据对象的不确定性状态选择不同的局部更新预算。

实验结果(表格)

method 汇总

methodmean ΔChamfermean ΔF@5joint scorecoverage safeselected policies
a66_uncertainty_damped_budget-0.00039090.001858-0.00053951{'gso_000_input4': 'a66_uncertainty_damped_budget', 'gso_002_input4': 'a66_uncertainty_damped_budget', 'gso_008_input4': 'a66_uncertainty_damped_budget'}
a67_visible_preserving_damping-0.00033610.002504-0.00053651{'gso_000_input4': 'a67_visible_preserving_damping', 'gso_002_input4': 'a67_visible_preserving_damping', 'gso_008_input4': 'a67_visible_preserving_damping'}
a67_coverage_friendly_damping-0.00028130.001956-0.00043781{'gso_000_input4': 'a67_coverage_friendly_damping', 'gso_002_input4': 'a67_coverage_friendly_damping', 'gso_008_input4': 'a67_coverage_friendly_damping'}
a67_conflict_microstep_only0.00003190.0002180.00001451{'gso_000_input4': 'a67_conflict_microstep_only', 'gso_002_input4': 'a67_conflict_microstep_only', 'gso_008_input4': 'a67_conflict_microstep_only'}
a68_adaptive_lambda_router-0.00051580.002714-0.00073291{'gso_000_input4': 'a66_uncertainty_damped_budget', 'gso_002_input4': 'a67_visible_preserving_damping', 'gso_008_input4': 'a67_coverage_friendly_damping'}

case 路由

caseconflictunobservedsaturatedselectedselected ΔChamferselected ΔF@5A66 ΔChamferA66 ΔF@5reason
gso_000_input413.1%23.59%Falsea66_uncertainty_damped_budget-0.0003827-0.000773-0.0003827-0.000773low/moderate conflict with enough unobserved/completion room; keep A66 global damping because fixed per-region lambdas over-damp
gso_002_input420.2%2.65%Falsea67_visible_preserving_damping-0.00108760.007837-0.00083940.006863moderate conflict and low unobserved region; preserve visible vertices while allowing conflict correction
gso_008_input470.5%0.02%Truea67_coverage_friendly_damping-0.00007700.0010780.0000494-0.000516saturated conflict with near-zero unobserved region; choose coverage-friendly micro damping to avoid full-step local damage

选择明细

caseselected policyiterΔChamferΔF@5jointvisible abs Δconflict abs Δregion spreadmesh file
gso_000_input4a66_uncertainty_damped_budget8-0.0003827-0.000773-0.00032080.00061410.00123940.0003742mesh_a66_uncertainty_damped_budget_iter008.obj
gso_002_input4a67_visible_preserving_damping8-0.00108760.007837-0.00171460.00091650.00355620.0047914mesh_a67_visible_preserving_damping_iter008.obj
gso_008_input4a67_coverage_friendly_damping1-0.00007700.001078-0.00016330.0001592-0.00033490.0001820mesh_a67_coverage_friendly_damping_iter001.obj

可视化结果

A68 Chamfer router comparison
A68 Chamfer router comparison
A68 F@5 router comparison
A68 F@5 router comparison
A68 joint router comparison
A68 joint router comparison

实验结论

下一步想法