实验 38:A32 Three-way Surface Router

把 surface evidence 拆成 accept / reject / defer,避免中性区域被误当作成功证据

实验定位 混合偏正 / 论文机制更清晰

A32 直接修复 A31 暴露的机制问题:surface router 不能把 neutral 当 accept。于是本轮把整 case 决策改成三路:有强正证据则 accept repair,有强冲突则 reject repair,证据不足则 defer 到 A24 calibrated route。

结果:A32 repair selected=4,false reject=3,false accept=0,F@5 Δ=0.0088。相比 A31,它把 false accept 2→0,同时 F@5 Δ 从 0.0068 提到 0.0088。

实验设计(Image-2 风格)

实验设计图:A32 three-way surface router
实验设计图:A32 three-way surface router
模块设计图:neutral evidence is not success
模块设计图:neutral evidence is not success

模块设计(Image-2 风格)

Three-way Rule

  • reject repair if surface_conflict_ratio > 0.42
  • reject repair if mean_surface_delta > 0.010
  • accept repair if surface_improved_ratio >= 0.45 or mean_surface_delta <= -0.015
  • accept repair if surface_improved_ratio >= 0.22, surface_conflict_ratio <= 0.34, and mean_surface_delta <= 0.004
  • otherwise defer to A24 calibrated route instead of treating neutral evidence as acceptance

Design Principle

A32 的核心不是多一个阈值,而是把证据语义拆开:positive evidence 支持保留 repair,negative evidence 要拒绝 repair,insufficient evidence 不应该被强行解释为成功,而是回退到更保守的 calibrated route。

实验结果(表格)

策略选择 repair 数false rejectfalse acceptdeferselected Chamfer Δselected F@5 Δ选择的 repair case
A24 calibrated340--0.000540.0067gso_000_input4, gso_002_input4, gso_009_input4
A31 binary surface router902--0.000150.0068gso_000_input4, gso_001_input4, gso_002_input4, gso_003_input4, gso_004_input4, gso_005_input4, gso_006_input4, gso_007_input4, gso_009_input4
A32 three-way surface router4306-0.000400.0088gso_000_input4, gso_002_input4, gso_006_input4, gso_009_input4

A32 逐 case 三路决策

casedecisionselectedsurface improvedsurface conflictsurface neutralmean surface ΔGT repair Chamfer ΔGT repair F@5 ΔFRFA原因
gso_000_input4acceptrepair_hybrid0.48010.12950.1351-0.02144-0.001600.0202['strong positive surface evidence']
gso_001_input4deferbaseline0.02940.04700.92360.00001-0.001050.0082yes['mostly neutral surface evidence; defer to A24 calibrated route']
gso_002_input4acceptrepair_hybrid0.66400.18620.1379-0.02789-0.003770.0502['strong positive surface evidence']
gso_003_input4deferbaseline0.15050.17670.67270.00248-0.00005-0.0041yes['ambiguous surface evidence; defer to A24 calibrated route']
gso_004_input4deferbaseline0.01060.01940.97000.00036-0.000410.0032yes['mostly neutral surface evidence; defer to A24 calibrated route']
gso_005_input4deferbaseline0.00000.00001.00000.000060.00119-0.0079['mostly neutral surface evidence; defer to A24 calibrated route']
gso_006_input4acceptrepair_hybrid0.24120.29700.26760.002740.001440.0204['moderate improvement with bounded conflict']
gso_007_input4deferbaseline0.00550.02750.96700.001010.00281-0.0188['mostly neutral surface evidence; defer to A24 calibrated route']
gso_008_input4rejectbaseline0.17390.70910.11700.015400.00474-0.0168['surface conflict is high']
gso_009_input4deferrepair_hybrid0.01520.02250.9623-0.00004-0.00006-0.0029['mostly neutral surface evidence; defer to A24 calibrated route']

可视化结果

A32 与 A24/A31 的错误类型对比
A32 与 A24/A31 的错误类型对比
A32 接受数量和 F@5 收益对比
A32 接受数量和 F@5 收益对比

实验结论

下一步想法